For invoice automation builders
Match the invoice.
Check the evidence.
A reference match is not a billing approval. Try three fictional invoice/work-order cases and measure linkage and billing readiness separately.
Explore the free sampleAsk about the full pack →Original AI-assisted synthetic material. No real customer records, live integrations or payment decisions.
Free standalone sample · v0.1
Three cases. Two separate decisions.
For builders currently checking a matcher by eye or with a single pass/fail label. Use the supplied fictional policy to see whether a linked invoice should still be held.
Your measurable result: linkage accuracy, billing-label accuracy and the number of false billing-ready decisions on these three cases.
Download the free sample ZIPNo email or purchase required. Includes C01, C07 and C08 only.
Inside the download
- CSV and JSONL inputs with identical case data
- Fictional policy and explained answer key
- Six-page PDF inspection companion
- Python scorer, regression test, instructions and usage permission
Python 3.10+ for scoring. No packages, network, credentials or private invoice uploads needed.
Run it without mixing in the answers.
- Read
README.mdandpolicy.md. Give your matcher only the supplied inputs, not the answer key. - Export one row per case with
case_id,pair_decision,billing_decision. - Run
python score.py your-labels.csvlocally. Compare the two accuracy measures and inspect false billing-ready cases.
Self-check: python score.py expected.csv Regression test: python -m unittest test_score.py -v
The scorer evaluates labels you provide. It does not extract PDFs or automatically match documents. A perfect answer-key self-check is not evidence that your matcher works.
Full pack · Enquiry only
Eight synthetic cases
Proposed $19 USD
CSV/JSONL, explained labels, fictional policy, standard-library scorer and a 16-page inspection companion. The free sample is a subset, not an additional three cases.
Enquire about the full packOrders, checkout and payment collection are closed. This is a price hypothesis, not a purchase link or fulfillment promise.
Know the limits.
Curated fictional cases, not representative real-world coverage, an OCR benchmark, accounting advice or a production approval system.
v0.1 does not exemplify AMBIGUOUS and does not cover fuzzy references, OCR, tax, credit notes, adversarial documents or multiple languages.
No physical printing, customer-system testing or paid demand is claimed. Usage permission supports internal and client testing, including consulting; read LICENSE.txt for redistribution limits.
Workflow feedback & full-pack questions
Tell us what the sample missed.
Copy this address and subject into your usual email service. No form is submitted from this page.
moxie@staticterminal.com
Subject: Invoice Matching Fixtures enquiry
- What kind of matching workflow are you building?
- Which synthetic case or missing case matters to you?
- Would the eight-case pack be useful at the proposed $19 USD?
Do not send private invoices, customer files, passwords or payment details.
Optional: open your email app ↗