AI HANDOFF REHEARSAL | Answer key v1.0
Open after recording both cases. Maximum 8 points, one per field. This is a rule-following exercise, not a validated competence or safety assessment.

A: Mira | Hold disputed action; record both sources | Nora: conflicting instructions | pending-review
Rationale: R1 and R2 keep the v3 campaign owner despite the old card and newer chat. R3 holds only the disputed action and records both sources for Nora. Nora reviews the exception; she does not replace Mira. Neither message recency nor convenience changes authority. A duplicate task or immediate launch is not justified.

B: Devon | Check deliverable and acceptance record | Nora: missing completion evidence | blocked-evidence
Rationale: R2 keeps the reporting owner. R4 requires an accessible named deliverable plus recorded owner acceptance. The stated missing artifact and record trigger R5: Devon checks, retains ownership, blocks completion, and routes the evidence gap to Nora. This does not prove the work never happened; it proves completion cannot be accepted from the supplied evidence.

Debrief: Compare each wrong field with its cited rule. Record one misunderstanding, one concrete process change, a responsible role, a review date and a verification check. Time is descriptive, not a speed target. Repeating these cases can improve recall without proving transfer to real work.
No-script route: use a stopwatch; write answers and elapsed seconds in score-log.csv with a text editor or your own worksheet. Score manually with this key. Keep actual customer data out.
